...And the Moon Be Still As Bright *Repost

This is a bad time of year for me. Bad things have happened in mid-June for a few years. Things that aren't fun to review in an online blog. I'm trying to channel this apprehension and woe into positive things, namely writing. And I've been writing ten-fold in the last few days, so let's hope I can keep it up.

A few of y'all know that I'm actively working on adapting Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles to the stage. It was a project Sam Weller (Ray's biographer) and I discussed and he is going to help me get the rights from Ray. Anyway, I'm working on the story called "The Fourth Expedition" or "...And the Moon be Still As Bright" The second title comes from a Lord Byron poem that I never bothered to find until today when I was working with that particular section.

I found it, and though it can on the surface describe a broken relationship, it also immediately reflected what makes this part of the month shitty.It touched me, even things that are going on that are slightly horrible and not the horridness that this part of June is known for seem to be enveloped in this simple mistral poem. I'm not an outright fan of Byron--I'm not an outright fan of any poet. I love reading poetry, but I don't have a strong grasp on particulars. Anyway, I really dug this on today, so I thought I'd share:

(Sorry about the weird formating...)

'So We'll Go No More a-Roving'
by George Gordon, Lord Byron
So we'll go no more a-roving
So late into the night,
Though the heart be still as loving,
And the moon be still as bright.

For the sword outwears its sheath,
And the soul outwears the breast,
And the heart must pause to breathe,
And love itself have rest.

Though the night was made for loving,
And the day returns too soon,
Yet we'll go no more a-roving
By the light of the moon.

Happy Loving Day! *Repost

Happy Loving Day!

It seems to have become a habit that I fill this with literary prose that I love but today is a special day and a tangent is necessary. Loving Day is the day the Supreme Court ruled against the anti-miscegenation laws (in Loving v. Virginia) that forbade people of different races from getting married to one another.

As a daughter of an inter-racial couple who had their own obstacles to overcome (even though it was an area where Mexicans and whites marrying wasn't new and it was 12 years after the Loving ruling), this is an important remembrance.

My father tells the story when my mother, my Tía Rosa and him went out to eat in Amarillo. They went to a restaurant, some small southern food place—chicken fried steak, barbeque, etc. The kind of place that had a slight glean to it from the amount of food that has been served and not ever truly properly cleaned. Good food but a questionable atmosphere with pictures of old rodeos and stuffed steer heads on the wall. They were sat near the front of the restaurant in a non-obvious, but not secluded table. And there they sat, with waiter after waiter walking past them: two dark haired, dark skinned Mexican Americans and my tall red-haired pale Viking-like father. My mother, always the person demanding respect, tried to wave down waiter to no avail. After thirty minutes of watching everyone around them be served and taken care of, they left assured that they would never go there again. Tía Rosa had been there before with her husband—a dark haired first generation from the Valley as well, and they didn't have any problems. But it was when my father and two Mexican women, it wasn't okay anymore.

They had priests who didn't like the fact they got married, old colleagues and friends who were displeased at my mother. Grumblings about red haired babies and such, but they stayed together (29 years July 21st). My parents did not, in any way, have the difficulties the Lovings had—but they would have had much more had the Lovings not come first. So, this day is an important day for me, and it should be for everyone because it was a very important day in equal rights.

Anyway, on to the sharing:

This is an article that was written last year for the 40th anniversary of the ruling. It's from ABCNews (there is also one at NPR).

For further reading, look at Loving Day Celebration. The Legal Map that shows when it became legal for interracial couples to marry is pretty cool.


Groundbreaking Interracial Marriage

Mildred Loving Never Expected Her Marriage Would End Up at the Supreme Court

By MELIA PATRIA

June 14, 2007 —

"I think marrying who you want is a right no man should have anything to do with. It's a God-given right," said Mildred Loving to ABC News 40 years ago.

A demure young woman from Caroline County, Va., Mildred Jeter Loving never desired attention or publicity. Least of all did she ever imagine she would enter the history books when she married her childhood sweetheart, Richard Loving.

It was 1958. Mildred, a black woman, and Richard, a white man, drove 80 miles to Washington, D.C., to exchange their wedding vows. Shortly after returning home to Virginia, the couple was arrested in the middle of the night for violating the state's law against interracial marriage.

"I guess it was about 2 a.m.," Mildred Loving said in a 1967 ABC News report. "I saw the lights, you know, and I woke up and it was the policeman standing beside the bed and he told us to get out and that we was under arrest."

That night marked the start of a legal battle that eventually led to the U.S. Supreme Court. On June 12, 1967, the landmark decision in Loving v. Virginia legalized interracial marriage across the country.

"I cannot believe it's been 40 years," Loving said in a recent interview with ABC News. "Things have changed for the better." Now 67 years old and a widow, with nine grandchildren and nine great grandchildren, she stills calls Caroline County home.

The Last Laws to Go

The Loving decision struck down anti-miscegenation laws in Virginia and 15 other states. In doing so, it put an end to the last piece of state-sanctioned segregation in the country.

Yet for decades after the decision, many states left the unenforceable laws on the books South Carolina did not remove its prohibitive clause until 1998, and Alabama held on to its ban until 2000. Clearly, even today, a gap remains between what is officially permitted and what is universally accepted. Unsurprisingly, some interracial couples say despite social progress, they still get looks, comments and even hostile threats.

Meant to Be?

"I never had any hostility towards the sheriff or the commonwealth," said Loving of the night she and her husband were arrested. "They were only doing their job, but I'm glad it happened. If they never prosecuted us, none of this would have come to terms. So maybe it was meant to be."

And with a last name perfect for a lawsuit about love, perhaps it was indeed. According to the most recent figures from the U.S. Census Bureau, there are now 2.3 million interracial couples in America approximately seven times the number there were in 1970.

Even Loving seems almost baffled by this growth. "Jim Webb, the congressman from my state, married an Asian lady," she said, referring to the junior senator from Virginia and his wife, Hong Li Webb. "It's still surprising to see it," she said. "But they're human like you and me."

'Loving Day' the Next Great Tradition?

In the last 40 years, the Loving decision has become symbolically important to an ever expanding group: from interracial couples and their mixed race children, to transracial adoptees and their families, to members of the gay, lesbian and transgendered community who are now lobbying for their own marriage rights.

But while the case is still talked about in law schools and by some activist groups, Jungmiwha Bullock, president of the Association of Multi-Ethnic Americans, an advocacy organization for mixed race people, said much of the larger population remains unfamiliar with the history. "We shy away from talking about race in public and when we do it gets sticky and political," she said. "But that doesn't mean we can't start."

To commemorate the 40th anniversary of Loving v. Virginia, Bullock has coordinated an international academic conference to take place later this month at Roosevelt University.

Bullock's efforts are not alone. Ken Tanabe, a graphics designer from New York City, wants June 12 to be a universally recognized day called "Loving Day." For the last four years, he has spearheaded annual celebrations in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Seattle and other cities across the nation.

On a recent Sunday afternoon, Tanabe addressed a crowd of 1,000 people at a Lower East Side park in New York City to celebrate Loving Day 2007. "I'd like to take this opportunity to say, 'Thank you Mr. and Mrs. Loving,'" he said over the microphone. "Can I get everyone to join me?' I want you to say the words on the count of three!"

The product of a Japanese-Belgian interracial marriage himself, 29-year-old Tanabe said he only learned about the Loving decision as an adult while surfing the Web. "I was shocked, stunned, I never heard of the Lovings&" he said. "How did I miss this?"

By throwing parties with an educational and community-building mission, Tanabe hopes the Loving decision will help fight present-day prejudice and become as recognizable to his generation as Brown v. Board of Education and Plessy v. Ferguson.

"Honestly, without the case I don't even know if I would be here because my parents couldn't have gotten married," said Tanabe. "I don't think I would have been born." While a federal holiday may be a long way in the making, Tanabe hopes people across the nation will adopt June 12 and pass it down to generations as a day to remember all that the Lovings fought for.

Banished From Virginia

Following the 1958 arrest, the Lovings were sentenced to a year in jail, but the sentencing was suspended as long the couple left the state and did not return together for 25 years. At the hearing, the county circuit judge Leon Bazile infamously stated that God created the races and placed them on separate continents. "The fact that He separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix," he said.

The Lovings spent the next five years in Washington, D.C., away from friends and family. Longing to return to rural Virginia, Mildred Loving wrote a letter to Attorney General Robert Kennedy, who in turn urged the couple to seek help from the American Civil Liberties Union.

"The only goal I had was to bring my family back to our roots and raise them in the country where I grew up," said Loving. "We hadn't hurt anyone. I didn't understand why we had to leave."

The Last Manifestation of Slavery

Attorney Bernard Cohen, a member of the ACLU, received a short letter from the Lovings explaining how they had three children and could not afford an attorney. "I took the case to put the final nail in the coffin of racism," Cohen said.

He teamed up with attorney Philip Hirschkop, and at no fee, they reopened the case in the Virginia courts, appealing each losing decision until the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court.

"It was a terrible time in America," said Cohen. "Racism was ripe and this was the last du jour vestige of racism there was a lot of de facto racism, but this law was terrible and it was the last on-the-books manifestation of slavery in America."

"We basically did our jobs as lawyers," said Hirschkop. "The case had had its time and we were the stewards to get it to the Supreme Court it just needed to get there."

Hirschkop notes that while some couples may have folded under the pressure, the Lovings remained united. Looking back, Loving said she took it one day at a time and did a lot of praying.

The court finally made its decision in June 1967, ruling that Virginia's anti-miscegenation laws violated both the equal protection clause and due process clause of the 14th Amendment. "Under our Constitution," the court said, "the freedom to marry, or not to marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the state."

"We were so very, very happy," said Loving recalling the day. "I can't describe the way I felt. It was as if I'd been free to live my life."

Soon after the family returned to Caroline County, Va. But as fate would have it, the marriage that made the couple famous ended tragically in 1975 when a drunken driver killed Richard in a car accident.

"I just wish that Richard was here to celebrate the anniversary," Loving said.

Still reticent to accept her hero status, she has not yet attended a Loving Day event, but she seems humbled to hear about its existence. "Isn't that something?" she said. "I never new it would be this big!"

What does Mildred Loving hope younger generations will take most from her story? "If you're pursuing something and you know it's right not to give up," she said. "Everyone has rights."

Blogger Templates by Blog Forum